Francis doesn’t speak much of abortion, homosexual marriage or contraceptives. He says it’s not necessary to insist on such topics – rather, more emphasis must be put on positive things, lest we lose the freshness and the perfume of the Gospel

The spiritual good of the People of God depends on the proclamation of the Gospel that was confided by Jesus Christ himself to Saint Peter and the Apostles. The true faithful expect an integral transmission of the eternal truths from their shepherds, even when it contrasts with the world. Others, on the contrary, would prefer that such truths be changed so that they could live with a more tranquil conscience…
In this manner, the fidelity of the Hierarchy to its mission entails proclaiming the word of salvation whether it be ‘convenient or inconvenient,’ and thus facing frequent hostility from those who live isolated from the truth.

Francis

We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods. This is not possible. I have not spoken much about these things, and I was reprimanded for that. But when we speak about these issues, we have to talk about them in a context. The teaching of the church, for that matter, is clear and I am a son of the church, but it is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time.
The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent. The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently. Proclamation in a missionary style focuses on the essentials, on the necessary things: this is also what fascinates and attracts more, what makes the heart burn, as it did for the disciples at Emmaus. We have to find a new balance; otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards, losing the freshness and fragrance of the Gospel. The proposal of the Gospel must be more simple, profound, radiant. It is from this proposition that the moral consequences then flow. (Interview with Antonio Spadaro, August 19, 2013)

[Journalist]: Speaking on behalf of the Brazilians: society has changed, young people have changed, and in Brazil we have seen a great many young people. You did not speak about abortion, about same-sex marriage. In Brazil a law has been approved which widens the right to abortion and permits marriage between people of the same sex. Why did you not speak about this?
[Francis]: The Church has already spoken quite clearly on this. It was unnecessary to return to it, just as I didn’t speak about cheating, lying, or other matters on which the Church has a clear teaching! It wasn’t necessary to speak of it, but rather of the positive things that open up the path to young people. Isn’t that right! Besides, young people know perfectly well what the Church’s position is. (Press Conference during the return flight from Brazil after World Youth Day, July 28, 2013)

 [Journalist]: In the recent past, it was normal to appeal to the so-called ‘non-negotiable’ values, especially in bioethics and sexual morality. You have not picked up on this formula. The doctrinal and moral principles have not changed. Does this choice perhaps wish to show a style less preceptive and more respectful of personal conscience?
[Francis]: I have never understood the expression ‘non-negotiable values.’ Values are values, and that is it. I can’t say that, of the fingers of a hand, there is one less useful than the rest ­— for which I do not understand in what sense there may be negotiable values. (Interview with Corriere della Serra, March 5, 2014)

Teachings of the Magisterium

Table of contents

Sacred Scripture
– I charge you: proclaim the Word of God whether convenient or inconvenient

Saint John Chrysostom
– He who has authority to teach, and does not, transgresses the Law

Pius X
– He who omits to teach the truth, cannot expect good works…

Leo XII
– The graver the evil, the more the Roman Pontiff ought to warn the faithful

Pius XI
– Use every care and diligence to exhort the faithful our divine religion

Vatican Council I
– The Church was commanded to guard the deposit of faith, lest anyone be deceived

Leo XIII
– Our silence profits only the enemies of the Church

Saint Thomas Aquinas
– Confess the faith publicly despite the disturbance of unbelievers

Benedict XVI
– The responsibility of constantly proclaiming non-negotiable values

 Vatican Council II
– Bishops are obliged to be authentic teachers of those committed to them
– By the will of Christ, the Church’s duty is to authoritatively teach the truth

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
– Silence is neither caring nor pastoral
– Clear communication of the truth depends on the fidelity of the Church’s ministers

Paul VI
– We may not silence the obligation of conjugal fidelity
– Church teachings are not easily accepted. But She cannot declare lawful what is unlawful

John Paul II
– Pastors have the duty to transmit doctrine in its integrity
– A serious omission: not to proclaim the truth about marriage
– The crises in the family requires doctrinal clarity
– Before the acceptance of abortion, we must ‘call things by their proper name’
– The negative precepts express the demands of the Gospel
– If respect is due to the life of criminals, much more should it be to that of the innocent
– The Church condemns authorities who favor activities against the family

Sacred Scripture

  • I charge you: proclaim the Word of God whether convenient or inconvenient

I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who will judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingly power: proclaim the word; be persistent whether it is convenient or inconvenient; convince, reprimand, encourage through all patience and teaching. For the time will come when people will not tolerate sound doctrine but, following their own desires and insatiable curiosity, will accumulate teachers and will stop listening to the truth and will be diverted to myths. But you, be self-possessed in all circumstances; put up with hardship; perform the work of an evangelist; fulfill your ministry. (2 Tim 4:1-5)

Saint John Chrysostom

  • He who has authority to teach, and does not, transgresses the Law

But see whence He begins, and whence He aggravates His blame of them. For they say, He says, and do not. For every one is worthy of blame in transgressing the law, but especially he that bears the authority of teaching, for doubly and triply does he deserve to be condemned. For one cause, because he transgresses; for another, that as he ought to amend others, and then halts, he is worthy of a double punishment, because of his dignity; and in the third place, that he even corrupts the more, as committing such transgression in a teacher’s place. (Saint John Chrysostom, Homily LXXII on St. Matthew, no. 72)

Pius X

  • He who omits to teach the truth, cannot expect good works…

Now, if we cannot expect to reap a harvest when no seed has been planted, how can we hope to have a people with sound morals if Christian doctrine has not been imparted to them in due time? It follows, too, that if faith languishes in our days, if among large numbers it has almost vanished, the reason is that the duty of catechetical teaching is either fulfilled very superficially or altogether neglected. (Pius X. Encyclical Acerbo Nimis, no. 16, April 15, 1905)

Leo XII

  • The graver the evil, the more the Roman Pontiff ought to warn the faithful

Hence, the graver the evils threatening the flock, the greater the solicitude the Roman Pontiffs ought to employ in preventing them. For, those who have been placed in the topmost Watch Tower of the Church can discern from afar the artifices which the enemies of the Christian family undertake to destroy the Church of Christ: (which they will never achieve) they can point them out and expose them to the faithful, who may then guard against them; they can drive away and remove them by their Authority.  (Leo XII, Apostolic Constitution Quo Graviora, no. 1, March 13, 1826)

Pius XI

  • Use every care and diligence to exhort the faithful our divine religion

Admonish and exhort them to be strong in our sacred faith, without which it is impossible to please God. Urge them to persevere firmly established in our divine religion, which alone is true and eternal and prepares for salvation and even, to a very great extent, preserves and prospers civil society. Through the parish priests chiefly and other ecclesiastics known for integrity of life, gravity of morals, and constant adherence to sound doctrine, may you teach unremittingly and accurately: at one time preaching the divine word, at another instructing the people in the mysteries of our august religion, its doctrine, precepts, and discipline. You, above all, know that many evils generally arise from ignorance of divine matters essential for salvation. Hence, you will understand that it behooves you to use every care and diligence that so detrimental a condition be prevented.  (Pius IX. Encyclical Quanto Conficiamur, nos. 13-14, August 10, 1863)

Vatican Council I

  • The Church was commanded to guard the deposit of faith, lest anyone be deceived

Further, the Church which, together with the apostolic duty of teaching, has received the command to guard the deposit of faith, has also, from divine Providence, the right and duty of proscribing ‘knowledge falsely so called’ (1Tim 6:20), ‘lest anyone be cheated by philosophy and vain deceit’ (cf. Col 2:8). (Denzinger-Hünermann 3018. Vatican Council I, Dogmatic Constitution Dei Filius, April 24, 1870)

Leo XIII

  • Our silence profits only the enemies of the Church

Amid such reckless and widespread folly of opinion, it is, as We have said, the office of the Church to undertake the defense of truth and uproot errors from the mind, and this charge has to be at all times sacredly observed by her, seeing that the honor of God and the salvation of men are confided to her keeping. But, when necessity compels, not those only who are invested with power of rule are bound to safeguard the integrity of faith, but, as St. Thomas maintains: ‘Each one is under obligation to show forth his faith, either to instruct and encourage others of the faithful, or to repel the attacks of unbelievers’ (STh II-II q.3, a.2, ad 2). To recoil before an enemy, or to keep silence when from all sides such clamors are raised against truth, is the part of a man either devoid of character or who entertains doubt as to the truth of what he professes to believe. In both cases such mode of behaving is base and is insulting to God, and both are incompatible with the salvation of mankind. This kind of conduct is profitable only to the enemies of the faith, for nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good. (Leo XIII. Encyclical Sapientiae Christianae, no. 14, January 10, 1890)

Saint Thomas Aquinas

  • Confess the faith publically despite the disturbance of unbelievers

Yet, if there is hope of profit to the faith, or if there be urgency, a man should disregard the disturbance of unbelievers, and confess his faith in public. Hence it is written (Mt 15:12) that when the disciples had said to Our Lord that ‘the Pharisee, when they heard this word, were scandalized,’ He answered: ‘Let them alone, they are blind, and leaders of the blind.’ (Saint Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica II-II, q. 3, a. 2, ad 3)

Benedict XVI             

  • The responsibility of constantly proclaiming non-negotiable values

Evidently, this is true for all the baptized, yet it is especially incumbent upon those who, by virtue of their social or political position, must make decisions regarding fundamental values, such as respect for human life, its defence from conception to natural death, the family built upon marriage between a man and a woman, the freedom to educate one’s children and the promotion of the common good in all its forms (Cf. John Paul II, Encyclical Evangelium Vitae: AAS 87(1995),401-522; Benedict XVI, Address to the Pontifical Academy for Life – 27 February 2006: AAS 98(2006), 264-265). These values are not negotiable. Consequently, Catholic politicians and legislators, conscious of their grave responsibility before society, must feel particularly bound, on the basis of a properly formed conscience, to introduce and support laws inspired by values grounded in human nature (Cf. Cong. for the Doct.of the Faith, Doctrinal note on questions regarding participation of Catholics in political life: AAS 96(2004),359-370). There is an objective connection here with the Eucharist (cf. 1Cor 11:27-29). Bishops are bound to reaffirm constantly these values as part of their responsibility to the flock entrusted to them (cf. Propositio 46). (Benedict XVI. Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis, no. 83, February 22, 2007)

Vatican Council II

  • Bishops are obliged to be authentic teachers of those committed to them

For bishops are preachers of the faith, who lead new disciples to Christ, and they are authentic teachers, that is, teachers endowed with the authority of Christ, who preach to the people committed to them the faith they must believe and put into practice, and by the light of the Holy Spirit illustrate that faith. They bring forth from the treasury of Revelation new things and old (Mt 13:52), making it bear fruit and vigilantly warding off any errors that threaten their flock (2Tim 4:1-4). (Vatican Council II, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium, no. 25, November 21, 1964)

  • By the will of Christ, the Church’s duty is to authoritatively teach the truth

For the Church is, by the will of Christ, the teacher of the truth. It is her duty to give utterance to, and authoritatively to teach, that truth which is Christ Himself, and also to declare and confirm by her authority those principles of the moral order which have their origins in human nature itself. (Vatican Council II, Declaration Dignitatis Humanae, no. 14, December 7,  1965)

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith

  • Silence is neither caring nor pastoral

But we wish to make it clear that departure from the Church’s teaching, or silence about it, in an effort to provide pastoral care is neither caring nor pastoral. Only what is true can ultimately be pastoral. The neglect of the Church’s position prevents homosexual men and women from receiving the care they need and deserve. (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the pastoral care of homosexual persons, no. 15, October 1, 1986)

Paul VI

  • We may not silence the obligation of conjugal fidelity

We may not silence the increased obligation of conjugal fidelity within the family; now that legal divorce has been granted the possibility of being carried out with impunity. In the same way, we may not forget the duty of all — especially ours, the Pastors — to deplore the permissive legislation regarding abortion. […] These problems of today, to which are added others, countless and immeasurable, turn  grave, and ever more grave, of our pastoral duty, our responsibility over the People of God, and over that which is not officially of God, but is, nonetheless always ours.  (Paul VI. General Audience, May 24, 1978)

  •  Church teachings are not easily accepted. But She cannot declare lawful what is unlawful

It is to be anticipated that perhaps not everyone will easily accept this particular teaching [on the illicitness of contraceptives]. There is too much clamorous outcry against the voice of the Church, and this is intensified by modern means of communication. But it comes as no surprise to the Church that She, no less than her divine Founder, is destined to be a ‘sign of contradiction’ (Lk 2:34). She does not, because of this, evade the duty imposed on her of proclaiming humbly but firmly the entire moral law, both natural and evangelical. Since the Church did not make either of these laws, she cannot be their arbiter—only their guardian and interpreter. It could never be right for Her to declare lawful what is in fact unlawful, since that, by its very nature, is always opposed to the true good of man.  (Paul VI. Encyclical Humanae Vitae, no. 18, July 25, 1968)

John Paul II

  • Pastors have the duty to transmit doctrine in its integrity

The Church’s Pastors have the duty to act in conformity with their apostolic mission, insisting that the right of the faithful to receive Catholic doctrine in its purity and integrity must always be respected. ‘Never forgetting that he too is a member of the People of God, the theologian must be respectful of them, and be committed to offering them a teaching which in no way does harm to the doctrine of the faith’ (cf. Cong. for the Doct. of the Faith, Instruction Donum Veritatis). (John Paul II. Encyclical Veritatis Splendor, no. 113, August 6, 1993)

  • A serious omission: not to proclaim the truth about marriage

Indeed, there is no lack of attempts, in public opinion and in civil legislation, to make equivalent to the family mere de facto unions or to recognize as such same-sex unions. These and other anomalies lead us with pastoral firmness to proclaim the truth about marriage and the family. Not to do so would be a serious pastoral omission that would lead people into error, especially those who have the important responsibility of making decisions for the common good of the nation. (John Paul II. Address to Bishops of Brazil on ad limina visit, no. 4, November 16, 2002)

  • The crises in the family requires doctrinal clarity

A pastoral proposal for the family in crisis presupposes, as a preliminary requirement, doctrinal clarity, effectively taught in moral theology about sexuality and the respect for life. The opposing opinions of theologians, priests and religious that the media promote on pre-marital relations, birth control, the admission of divorced persons to the sacraments, homosexuality and artificial insemination, the use of abortion practices or euthanasia, show the degree of uncertainty and confusion that disturb and end by deadening the consciences of so many of the faithful. (John Paul II. Address to Bishops of Brazil on ad limina visit, no. 4, November 16, 2002)

  • Before the acceptance of abortion, we must ‘call things by their proper name’

But today, in many people’s consciences, the perception of its gravity [of abortion] has become progressively obscured. The acceptance of abortion in the popular mind, in behavior and even in law itself, is a telling sign of an extremely dangerous crisis of the moral sense, which is becoming more and more incapable of distinguishing between good and evil, even when the fundamental right to life is at stake. Given such a grave situation, we need now more than ever to have the courage to look the truth in the eye and to call things by their proper name, without yielding to convenient compromises or to the temptation of self-deception. In this regard the reproach of the Prophet is extremely straightforward: ‘Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness’ (Is 5:20). (John Paul II. Encyclical Evangelium Vitae, no. 58, March 25, 1995)

  • The negative precepts express the demands of the Gospel

The commandments of which Jesus reminds the young man are meant to safeguard the good of the person, the image of God, by protecting his goods. ‘You shall not murder; you shall not commit adultery; you shall not steal; you shall not bear false witness’ are moral rules formulated in terms of prohibitions. These negative precepts express with particular force the ever urgent need to protect human life, the communion of persons in marriage, private property, truthfulness and people’s good name. The commandments thus represent the basic condition for love of neighbor; at the same time they are the proof of that love. They are the first necessary step on the journey towards freedom, its starting-point.  (John Paul II. Encyclical Veritatis Splendor, no. 13, August 6, 1993)

  • If respect is due to the life of criminals, much more should it be to that of the innocent

If such great care must be taken to respect every life, even that of criminals and unjust aggressors, the commandment ‘You shall not kill’ has absolute value when it refers to the innocent person. And all the more so in the case of weak and defenseless human beings, who find their ultimate defence against the arrogance and caprice of others only in the absolute binding force of God’s commandment.[…] Faced with the progressive weakening in individual consciences and in society of the sense of the absolute and grave moral illicitness of the direct taking of all innocent human life, especially at its beginning and at its end, the Church’s Magisterium has spoken out with increasing frequency in defense of the sacredness and inviolability of human life. (John Paul II. Encyclical Evangelium Vitae, no. 58, March 25, 1995)

  • The Church condemns authorities who favor activities against the family

Thus the Church condemns as a grave offense against human dignity and justice all those activities of governments or other public authorities which attempt to limit in any way the freedom of couples in deciding about children. Consequently, any violence applied by such authorities in favor of contraception or, still worse, of sterilization and procured abortion, must be altogether condemned and forcefully rejected. Likewise to be denounced as gravely unjust are cases where, in international relations, economic help given for the advancement of peoples is made conditional on programs of contraception, sterilization and procured abortion. (John Paul II. Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio, no. 30, November 22, 1981)

2 thoughts on “Francis doesn’t speak much of abortion, homosexual marriage or contraceptives. He says it’s not necessary to insist on such topics – rather, more emphasis must be put on positive things, lest we lose the freshness and the perfume of the Gospel

  1. “Besides, young people know perfectly well what the Church’s position is.”
    Sadly, they do not!
    I remember a young catholic man coming to my clinic for STD testing and having much anxiety. He had been engaging in multiple homosexual acts with variable men. We talked; he said he never knew that the Church teaches it is a sin to do what he was doing. This man went to Mass most Sundays.

    Like

Comment on this item of the DzB?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s